This article first appeared in  vol. 8, nr. 6, September 1998.

The GIB Zone (6)  'GIB versus Zia'
  by Onno Eskes
 
 The quest for the one million pounds
 
As declarer, GIB can measure up to anyone, but as we all know, points are won or lost in the auction. This past year, professor Ginsberg has tackled the near impossible problem of getting the computer to bid well, both constructively and competitively.

GIB's spectacular achievements as declarer are based on a fast-as-lightning 'double dummy solver', a piece of software which can determine the optimal contract and line of play for each deal, as well as the best defense. This double dummy solver was also put into action in the bidding. The bidding relies on a very extensive data base of bidding rules, but as soon as this data base fails to provide an answer for the next call to be made, GIB rapidly generates deals which are consistent with the auction up to that point. He then determines the optimal contract for all those deals and selects the call which most often leads to the best-scoring contract.
This procedure is reminiscent of these typical rubber bridge auctions in which one of the partners at a given stage says that he has sufficient information and makes the final call. Sometimes, this goes completely wrong, but it has the advantage of usually avoiding the misunderstandings of inexperienced partnerships. Ginsberg presented his computers, GIB East and GIB West (let's call them E.Gib and W.Gib - the bridge BeeGees, one could say. Ed.) with a bidding quiz developed by Larry Cohen, based on the deals and scores of the 1997 Politiken World Pairs.
 
 

3. E/NS datum score:NS -320   WEST 
  W. Gib 
  -  
    1  
    4 
 
NORTH 
- 
- 
2 
Pass
EAST 
E. Gib 
1 
3 
Pass 
 
SOUTH 
- 
1 
Pass 
Pass
A 8 6 4 3 2 
10 
Q 9 
10 7 6 3
K J 9 5 
Q 7 5 3 
K 8 5 
A 5
- -
 
5. W/NS datum score:NS -870   WEST 
  W. Gib 
  1NT 
   2  
   3 
   Pass
-------- EAST 
E. Gib 
2  
3 
6 
------
Q 4 
A 8 6 3 
A Q 4 3 
K Q 9

K Q 10 9 7 5 2 
10 
A 10 5 3
- -
 
It's clear where the data base terminates. On the first deal it's lost after 2. E. Gib starts calculating and reaches the conclusion that partner will often be short in hearts and that 4 should be close to the mark. That explains his agressive 3-call. This results in a 7-imp pick up as this game was missed at half the tables.

On the second deal, the auction goes according to the data base rules up to 3. The 2-bid promises four-card heart support and a doubleton in spades. Then, E. Gib is left once more to his own devices, and after analysing several dozen possible west hands it concludes that the odds favor a slam, and so he bids it. Again an 11-imp gain. Over the twenty deals of the quiz, the Gibs net +2 - an excellent result considering that the scoring is based on that of a field of world class players.

And so, Ginsberg considered himself ready for the match against Zia and his regular partner, Michael Rosenberg. The match was played last month [August '98] on Internet's OKBridge; fourteen deals with Butler scoring against the OKBridge field. After thirteen of the fourteen deals Zia-Rosenberg were leading 24-16, in part thanks to a successful 1-psych by Zia: the Gibs kept bidding to a way-too-high 3NT, and had to suffer in silence as Zia and Rosenberg garnered the first six tricks in spades.

The Gibs had an opportunity to decide the outcome in their favor on the very last deal:
 

E/NS K 10 6 3 
A 4 2 
10 8 3 
A Q 3
  WEST 
  W. Gib 
  - 
  Pass 
  Pass 
  Pass
NORTH 
Rosenberg 
- 
2 
3 
Pass
EAST 
E. Gib 
1 
Double 
Pass 
Pass
SOUTH 
Zia 
1 
2 
4
J 9 7 4 2 
Q 8 
9 7 
9 6 4 2
spade A 8 5 

A K Q J 5 
K 10 8 7
-
K J 10 9 7 6 3 
6 4 2 
J 5
 
 Zia and Rosenberg overbid to 4. The Gibs need +500 on this deal to save the match. That's just possible. For starters, the contract must be doubled. Then, as East cashes three top diamonds, West has to intervene: he has to ruff his partner's third diamond trick and switch to clubs. Or, E. Gib has to see through the problem and play a small diamond at trick three, forcing his brother to ruff. E. Gib panicks, however, and after two diamond tricks he cashes the ace of spades for one down. Plus 100 does yield 2 imps, but the final score is in Zia's favor: 24-18. No million pounds for Zia, but his honor has been saved [cf. first instalments of The GIB Zone].

In the previous issue of IMP we predicted a GIB world title in the Par Contest at the Lille Olympiad. GIB got a foretaste with an overwhelming victory in the world championship for bridge programs at the Chicago Summer Nationals. In the semi-finals, GIB faced Bridge Baron:
 

S/neither K Q10 7 6 
K 9 7 6 3 

J 8 3
  WEST 
  W. Gib 
  - 
  Pass 
 
NORTH 
N. Baron 
- 
Pass
EAST 
E. Gib 
- 
Pass
SOUTH 
S. Baron 
2
J 9 8 5 2 
Q 2 
K 9 3 
A K 7
spade A 3 
J 10 4 
8 6 4 2 
Q 9 6 4
-
A 8 5 
A Q J 10 7 5 
10 5 2 
 
Against South's 2 (weak two), W.Gib led the Q, won by South's ace. Next came a spade to the queen and ace, and E. Gib persisted with the J for dummy's king. Baron now pitched a club loser on the K. Besides the A, the defense is entitled to one trick in hearts, two in clubs and the K. The setting trick will have to come from the trump suit. The Gibs finish the job in elegant fashion: West wins the club lead from dummy with the king and underleads his A. East wins with the queen and cashes the 10 as West jettisons the A! The next club lead seals Baron's fate: the trump promotion causes the loss of two trump tricks.

Next month: the World Championship Par Contest.


To IMP Bridge Index